May

31

Obama’s reaction to a question that seeks his reaction to the reports that both he and his wife are members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and that there have been discussions about a North American Union, and the implementation of the AMERO, as a new currency for all of (a borderless) North America.

Yesterday’s post Amero Watch - Enter the Council on Foreign Relations, gave a brief background on the CFR. For more of a background on the CFR, here’s another short video you should see:

 

In the first video, Senator Obama states, “I don’t know if I’m an official member. I’ve spoken there before. It’s basically just a forum where a bunch of people [waves his hand] talk about foreign policy.” For a candidate so committed in an election so heavily dependent on views on foreign relations and diplomacy, I’m surprised he waves off the mention of “a bunch of people talking foreign policy.” Aren’t you?

There are members of the CFR, senator. You should know, because your wife, Michelle Obama, is on the board of directors of the Chicago committee for the CFR. (Do a page search for: Michelle Obama): http://www.ccfr.org/chicago_council_board_directors.php).
He doesn’t address this part of the question at all.

He stumbles over the “North American Uuuuunion” and follows by stating, “I see no evidence of this taking place.” In my first Amero Watch post, Lou Dobbs outlines George W. Bush’s policies that have been put into action by the signing of a formal agreeement. Do you not know about this, Senator Obama? And no, this wasn’t reported on Fox News. As reported, Bush signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America without the approval of Congress or the American people. Shouldn’t this be something you’re on top of, Senator? Something that critics have called, NAFTA on Steroids. ?

Still not convinced that something is going on behind closed doors?

Get a load of this:

According to the wikipedia entry for North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), signed into action by Bill Clinton on January 1, 1994:

“While different groups advocate for a further integration into a North American Community, sensitive issues have hindered that process. The three countries have pursued different trade policies with non-members (for example, Mexico has signed FTAs with more than 40 countries in 12 agreements), making the possibility of creating a customs union difficult to accomplish. Former President Vicente Fox of Mexico had promoted the idea of enhancing NAFTA (into what he labeled “NAFTA-Plus”, or possibly a North American Community), but after the September 11, 2001 attacks, priorities in the United States changed. The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America was signed, instead, as a separate and unrelated agreement.

Furthermore:

“In an interview with Larry King on October 8, 2007, Vicente Fox described any plans for a North American single currency as a “Long term, very long term” proposal. He also spoke of his and U.S. President George W. Bush’s support for the Free Trade Area of the Americas as a “first step” toward “a new vision” for the Americas, like we are trying to do with NAFTA,” but then said that Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez had decided to ‘destroy the idea’.”

Now take a look at this from BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4359386.stm

Venezuela’s President, Hugo Chavez, says he is in possession of intelligence showing that the United States plans to invade his country.

Chavez says, “A coup happened in Venezuela that was prepared by the US. What do they want? Our oil, as they did in Iraq?” Well, maybe they want something more… Maybe Chavez just another obstacle to this new vision of the America’s, and eventually the world.

Obama states “I was opposed to NAFTA.” According to columnist James Travers, “Multiple sources say the Canadian note questioning the Democrat front-runner’s public promise to reopen NAFTA was leaked from the Prime Minister’s Office to a Republican contact before it made American headline news.”

Indeed it did, as CNN reports, “The AP obtained a memo from a Canadian diplomat saying an Obama adviser had told Canada’s government the candidate’s criticism of NAFTA was “more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans.”

Take a look at a statement published on the CFR website by Richard N. Haass: (http://www.cfr.org/publication/9903/sovereignty_and_globalisation.html)

“Globalisation thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere. Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary.”
-Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations, Feb 17, 2006

At that town hall meeting, no one even uttered the word “conspiracy”, Senator Obama. It came from your mouth, not that crazy theorist in the audience.

Note to the general public: I will never take my own life - so don’t let them tell you I did.

 

I jest. But it’s a good story, no?

Share This!
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Newsvine] [Technorati] [Yahoo!] [Email] More »

May

30

Here’s a little more background, and introduction to the Council on Foreign Relations or CFR. I’m kind of disappointed with the unabashed endorsement commercial for Ron Paul at the end, but what do you expect on the internet? There are facts, and C-SPAN footage of real candidates, so there is a hint of credibility in the information being presented. Not to mention that Ron Paul has publicly stated his views on the subjects expressed.

For those that have never heard of the Council on Foreign Relations, past and future posts may help wrap your head around it. A little background:

The Council on Foreign Relations

began as an outgrowth of meetings during World War I. The talks evolved into Woodrow Wilson’s famous “fourteen points,” which were Globalist in nature, calling for the removal of all economic barriers between nations, equality of trade conditions, and the formation of a general assembly of nations. Colonel Edward Mandell House, Wilson’s confidential adviser, described himself as a Marxist socialist, and authored a book in 1912 entitled Philip Dru: Administrator. In the book, he described a post-war world and a “conspiracy” within the United States with the goals of establishing a centralized bank, a graduated income tax, and control of both political parties.

In 1919, the Treaty of Versailles forced Germany to heavy reparations to the Allies, which ruined Germany’s economy, causing Depression, which directly led to the rise of Adolf Hitler. On May 30, 1919, Colonel House and British and American delegates met at Paris’ Majestic Hotel, and outlined plans for the formation of the “Institute of International Affairs”. The institute was to be established in order to influence public opinion toward the acceptance of one-world government.

In New York, the U.S. branch of the institution, the Council on Foreign Relations (or CFR), was incorporated on July 21, 1921. The bylaws of the new organization stated that anyone revealing details of the CFR meetings could be dropped from membership. Since 1945, the CFR’s headquarters have been in the Harold Pratt House in NYC, the building donated by the Pratt family of Rockefeller’s Standard Oil.

Why all the hoopla about people in high-ranking political positions and the secretive nature, and globalist “conspiracy” fueled by talk of the CFR? Consider in 1940, when CFR member Henry Stimson became secretary of war, and brought with him fellow member John J. McCloy as assistant secretary for personnel. McCloy (a former CFR chairman, chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, and mentor to David Rockefeller) commented, “Whenever we needed a new man [for a government position], we just thumbed through a roll of council members and put a call through to New York.”

According to some, the CFR has exerted influence and control over U.S. policies for nearly the past century. For almost sixty years, this influenced has been shared with another closely related secretive group - the Bilderbergers.

Check back TOMORROW for a fun post on Barack Obama and his response to questions regarding the Council on Foreign Relations and the proposed North American Union and new currency - the Amero.

Share This!
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Newsvine] [Technorati] [Yahoo!] [Email] More »

May

27

Amero Watch - May 27, 2008

May 27, 2008 – 6:38 am | in Conspiracy | 1 Comment

Here’s a little bit of primer into the series of posts that will keep watch on the current events that appear innocuous, but are shaping up to lead the United States and the world into one. Stay tuned for future updates on the U.S. dollar falling into the pits of hell and the Amero rising from the ashes. Better still, look for future updates on the National ID card complete with RFID chip.

Share This!
[Ask] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Newsvine] [Technorati] [Yahoo!] [Email] More »

Subscribe

Search

  • Categories

  • Calendar

    March 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  

  • Archives

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments